Category Archives: Laurence R. O’Donnell

“Bavinck’s Bug” or “Van Tilian” Hypochrondria? (Laurence R. O’Donnell)

“‘Bavinck’s Bug’ or ‘Van Tilian’ Hypochrondria?: An Analysis of Prof. Oliphint’s Assertion That Cognitive Realism and Reformed Theology Are Incompatible” by Laurence R. O’Donnell

The following is an analysis of two essays by Prof. K. Scott Oliphint wherein he levels criticisms against Herman Bavinck’s (1854-1921) formulation of realism as the cognitive foundation for non-theological knowledge (hereafter: philosophy). The form of the reply, a loosely-interpreted scholastic quaestio, reflects Bavinck’s own presentation of the topic.

Neither “Copernican” nor “Van Tilian” (Laurence R. O’Donnell)

“Neither ‘Copernican’ nor ‘Van Tilian’: Re-Reading Cornelius Van Til’s Reformed Apologetics in light of Herman Bavinck’s Reformed Dogmatics by Laurence R. O’Donnell

As a Presbyterian it is a special pleasure to be with you here in the cradle of Presbyterianism in order to reflect upon the relationship between Herman Bavinck (1854–1921) and one of his American Presbyterian proteges―Cornelius Van Til (1895–1987). After providing a few introductory remarks on Van Til’s neo-Calvinist heritage, I will summarize his basic attitude toward Bavinck’s theology and provide a snapshot of how the English translations of Bavinck’s works have influenced the perception of Bavinck’s influence upon Van Til in recent scholarship. I will then adduce three lines of evidence which, when taken together, suggest that Bavinck’s theological influence upon Van Til is pervasive. Finally, I will conclude with a brief analysis of Van Til’s appropriations of Bavinck’s thought and some reflections on the future of Van Til studies.