All posts by James

The Crucial Concept of Self-Deception in Presuppositional Apologetics (Greg L. Bahnsen)

“The Crucial Concept of Self-Deception in Presuppositional Apologetics” by Greg L. Bahnsen

That self-deception which is practiced by all unregenerate men according to the Apostle Paul’s incisive description in Romans 1:18ff. is at once religiously momentous and yet philosophically enigmatic. It is also one of the focal points in continuing criticism of Cornelius Van Til’s apologetic and, as such, invites analysis with a view to supplementing and strengthening the saintly professor’s remarkable contribution to the history of apologetics. …

Van Til’s Life and Impact (Greg L. Bahnsen)

“Van Til’s Life and Impact” by Greg L. Bahnsen

Cornelius Van Til may not have seemed a likely candidate to accomplish a “Reformation of
Christian Apologetics,” but God is in the habit of utilizing unlikely candidates to mount great victories for His kingdom. Van Til “wanted to be a farmer…. Instead he became one of the foremost Christian apologists of our time,” to use the words of David Kucharsky in Christianity Today (Dec. 30, 1977, p. 18). …

Van Til’s Why I Believe in God (Greg L. Bahnsen)

“Van Til’s Why I Believe in God” by Greg L. Bahnsen

Want a small gem which explains and illustrates presuppositional apologetics? Then get hold of Cornelius Van Til’s brief pamphlet “Why I Believe in God.” It isn’t flashy in style. It isn’t complex in content. But it is devastating.

 

The pamphlet is less than twenty (small) pages long and is written in an easy, conversational style. It has Van Til “talking” to the reader in an imaginary dialog over belief in God — comparing his life to the reader’s hypothetical background and education, parrying objections, and always coming back to the underlying nature of the dispute itself. …

Van Til’s Challenge to Illegitimate Common Ground (Greg L. Bahnsen)

“Van Til’s Challenge to Illegitimate Common Ground” by Greg L. Bahnsen

The last two issues of Penpoint have featured essays on the apologetic of Dr. Cornelius Van Til, as does this one, because 1995 is the centennial of his birth, and one of our key objectives at SCCCS has been to honor, preserve, and advance Van Til’s distinctive and reformational defense of the Christian faith. [FOOTNOTE: See my article “Socrates or Christ: The Reformation of Christian Apologetics” in Foundations of Christian Scholarship: Essays in the Van Til Perspective, ed. Gary North (Vallecito, CA: Ross House, 1976), pp. 191-239 (available from CTM).] It is worth preserving. …

Van Til’s Presuppositionalism (Greg L. Bahnsen)

“Van Til’s Presuppositionalism” by Greg L. Bahnsen

1995 celebrates the centennial of the birth of Cornelius Van Til, the most profound writer in apologetics in the twentieth century. His distinctive method was called the “presuppositional” defense of the faith, which is explained in this excerpt from Dr. Bahnsen’s upcoming book on Van Til’s apologetic, including readings and analysis. …

At War with the Word: The Necessity of Biblical Antithesis (Greg L. Bahnsen)

“At War with the Word: The Necessity of Biblical Antithesis” by Greg L. Bahnsen

The following discussion is an excerpt from the 1987 Van Til Lectures, delivered by Dr. Bahnsen at Westminster Seminary, Philadelphia.

 

The antithesis between followers of God and followers of Satan is sovereignly inflicted as God’s judicial curse. This enmity is not only social but also intellectual in nature, and, therefore, to ignore it in our apologetic is to compromise the gospel.

 

Without the ingredient of antithesis, Christianity is not simply anemic. It has altogether forfeited its challenge to all other worldviews. Anyone who is familiar with the corpus of Van Til’s publications and writings will recognize that the subject of antithesis is one fitting hallmark of his scholarly contribution to twentieth century apologetical theory. …

Machen, Van Til and the Apologetical Tradition of the OPC (Greg L. Bahnsen)

“Machen, Van Til and the Apologetical Tradition of the OPC” by Greg L. Bahnsen

Apologetics gave birth to the Orthodox Presbyterian Church and continues to be its legacy and reputation. The modernism of the early twentieth century was not simply a theological variant within historic Christianity, not merely a new version of Christian doctrine which retained at its center the evangel. It was, according to J. Gresham Machen’s analysis in Christianity and Liberalism, a departure from the Christian religion altogether, abandoning the proclamation of the supernaturalistic good news of redemption which had distinguished the Christian church throughout history. Liberalism was simply another religion or philosophy of man in competition with the historic biblical faith. Accordingly, the battle with modernism was more than “polemical theology” against an exegetically weak or inconsistent school of evangelical Christianity. It was apologetics with unbelief. …

The Encounter of Jerusalem with Athens (Greg L. Bahnsen)

“The Encounter of Jerusalem with Athens” by Greg L. Bahnsen

What indeed has Athens to do with Jerusalem? What concord is there between the Academy and the Church?… Our instructions come from “the porch of Solomon”…. Away with all attempts to produce a mottled Christianity of Stoic, Platonic, and dialectic composition! We want no curious disputation after possessing Christ Jesus…!

 

So said Tertullian in his Prescription against Heretics (VII). Tertullian’s question, what does Athens have to do with Jerusalem?, dramatically expresses one of the perennial issues in Christian thought—a problem which cannot be escaped by any Biblical interpreter, theologian, or apologist. We all operate on the basis of some answer to that question, whether we give it explicit and thoughtful attention or not. It is not a matter of whether we will answer the question, but only of how well we will do so. …

Pragmatism, Prejudice, and Presuppositionalism (Greg L. Bahnsen)

“Pragmatism, Prejudice, and Presuppositionalism” by Greg L. Bahnsen

This essay cannot attempt to do justice to the multiple avenues traversed by twentieth-century philosophers; they constitute a maze of both overlapping and divergent lines of thought: idealism, realism, phenomenology, process philosophy, existentialism, positivism, pragmatism, and linguisticanalysis. Each has a claim on the Christian scholar’s attention. However, we must narrow the field. It  is reasonably accurate to distinguish the emphasis on phenomenology and existentialism on the Continent from the dominance of pragmatism and analysis in England and America. Since the present study is being done in the context of Anglo-American scholarship, we shall focus our attention on the schools of pragmatism and linguistic analysis-all the while recognizing the affinities which can be seen between them and aspects of European thought. Three prominent philosophers in these traditions who have had distinctive proposals in the theory of knowledge are John Dewey, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and John L. Austin; as will be later exhibited; common elements in their approaches bind them together in various ways. …